Employment Law Digest August – Case Law Update
Redundancy – selection pools and meaningful consultation In Valimulla v Al-Khair Foundation: Mr Valimulla was a liaison officer, based in…
These FAQs set out the common questions and pitfalls faced by employers when dealing with grievances. The additional documents referred to are designed to assist you further. Please note that some documents are available to all readers whilst others are locked and only accessible to HR Protect clients. To become a retainer client or to find out further information please click here.
It is a complaint, concern or problem raised by a member of staff. It can cover anything from a complaint about a colleague and the way they have been treated, to a complaint about unequal pay or an unfair process.
A grievance can also cover a complaint of bullying and harassment and discrimination although many organisations have a separate policy for handling these concerns.
No. A grievance can be a verbal complaint made to someone’s manager or headteacher. Ideally, however, you would ask your member of staff if they want to put their grievance in writing so that there is a record. If a grievance is put in writing, it does not prevent an informal approach being taken if appropriate.
No. In many cases it is appropriate to deal with a grievance informally, particularly where it has been a one off or minor incident. Speaking to the parties involved on an informal basis can often diffuse the situation and enables the parties to see the other’s point of view.
If the informal approach does not resolve the issue then the next step is to use the formal process. You should also use the formal process where the incident is more serious, or there have been a number of incidents, or the aggrieved person insists.
If you have a grievance policy it will also provide guidance on the approach to follow.
For further guidance on the process employers need to follow see:
Flowchart: Grievance
It is not a mandatory requirement for schools to have a grievance policy in place, but it can be extremely helpful when dealing with such matters as it sets out what is expected of the employee and school in these situations. It is crucial that all grievance policies incorporate the provisions of the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures as a minimum:
https://www.acas.org.uk/acas-code-of-practice-for-disciplinary-and-grievance-procedures/html
For a compliant policy please see:
G11: Grievance Policy and Procedure
This should be someone who is independent to the issues. Ideally it should be the direct line manager of the complainant or the headteacher. If the grievance is about that line manager then it should be their line manager or someone more senior.
If you have are a small school where there is no one truly independent then you could consider asking governor or an external person from specialist investigation company or with an HR background to undertake the investigation.
All employees are entitled to be accompanied to a grievance hearing, by either a colleague or Trade Union representative. There is no right to be accompanied to a grievance investigation meeting. Where the employer fails to allow the employee to be accompanied to a grievance hearing and the individual subsequently brings a claim in the Employment Tribunal, this failure in itself attracts a separate award of compensation. See:
G3: Acknowledgement of grievance and invitation to grievance meeting
G4: Grievance meeting guidance
Yes.
It is not unusual for someone who is subject to a disciplinary or performance management process, for example, to raise a grievance to say that they have been treated unfairly. You have three options:
The approach you take will depend on a number of factors such as; is the aggrieved saying that the disciplinary process itself is unfair which may mean that their grievance needs to be investigated independently? You would have to be mindful of any delay to the disciplinary process if you choose to pause it whilst the grievance is investigated.
Or are they saying that, for example, their manager has treated them unfairly which is why they have behaved as they have, in which case it may be suitable to have a combined investigation and grievance process.
Or is it a more general grievance about how they have been treated which would have no effect on the outcome of any disciplinary process? In which case the processes could be kept separate.
Yes although the investigation might be limited if you are unable to clarify the issues with the person who has raised the grievance.
Potentially yes.
If the individual raised the grievance whilst they were still employed then you should investigate their concerns particularly as it may be the basis for an Employment Tribunal claim.
If they raised the grievance after they have left your employment you will need to consider the risk that they may bring a claim arising out of the issues in the grievance and if that claim can be brought in time.
If the grievance raises serious issues about bullying and harassment by management or a group of employees, for example, it could be necessary to investigate those concerns particularly if there is a potential for impact on the individuals who remain. If the grievance concerns allegations relevant to safeguarding then you should always investigate.
Often employers are found by Employment Tribunals to have not taken a balanced approach to the investigation and only investigated the facts in support of the allegations, not those which support the employee.
Allegations in a grievance can be complex and can cover a long period of time. It is crucial that the investigator is clear about what allegations need to be investigated. Ideally the scope of the investigation should be agreed with the aggrieved at the outset.
Raising a grievance is often a very stressful time for the individual making the complaint and the individuals being investigated. If the investigation is handled poorly, it can badly damage the employment relationship. Investigations do not always run to plan and there can be delays. It is very important to keep the line of communication open with all those involved and provide updates on the progress of the investigation particularly if there is a delay.
Clearly, each case turns on its own facts, but employers need to be very wary of being capable of justifying any differences in treatment. If the decision is not capable of justification then it may give rise to a constructive unfair dismissal claim, and potentially some form of discrimination claim if the individual can show that the difference in treatment can be explained by their protected characteristic.
There is no legal requirement to do so and organisations often make the decision not to because of the sensitive nature of the allegations and information provided.
Careful consideration will need to be given to any request for a copy of the notes. Remember that someone can make a subject access request and obtain the notes in that way. Schools can be the subject to freedom of information requests which can yield a wider range of documents.
For further guidance on the appropriate grievance process please see:
Flowchart: grievances and D1: How to Guide: Grievances
Index – Grievances
G1- How to Guide – Grievances
G3 – Acknowledgement of Grievance and Invitation to Grievance Meeting
G4 – Letter of Invitation to Appeal Meeting
G5 – Grievance Outcome Letter
G6 – Appeal Meeting Outcome Letter
G7 – Grievance Meeting Guidance
G8 – Grievance Appeal Meeting Guidance
G9 – Grievance Policy and Procedure (MAT)
G10 – Grievance Policy and Procedure (School)
G11 – Letter of Invitation to a Grievance Investigation Meeting for witnesses
Redundancy – selection pools and meaningful consultation In Valimulla v Al-Khair Foundation: Mr Valimulla was a liaison officer, based in…
This introduces a new duty on employers to take reasonable steps to prevent their workers from being sexually harassed…
In the ever-changing landscape of UK employment law, the Workers (Predictable Terms and Conditions) Act (the “Act”) is a…
With a focus on protecting workers’ rights and promoting fair treatment in the workplace, the Labour Government has outlined…
Consideration of redeployment in ill-health dismissal In Budgen v Royal Mail Group Ltd: The Claimant, an operational postal worker, was…
From making a note of difficult conversations to recording and tracking absence the impact of effective record keeping can’t…
It has been around a decade since the European Court of Justice decided that the Working Time Regulations 1998…
The MAC’s report last month returned positive findings despite ministers’ concerns that the Graduate route was…
Limited access modeSorry, you need to be an HR Protect client to access this content.
HR Protect clients receive all the employment law advice they need across the year, delivered by experienced specialist lawyers, at a single fixed price. In addition, being a client gives you access to our templates, flowcharts and guidance notes on this Hub, where you can also return to your favourites, share content with colleagues, and manage your account.
For a full list of benefits, click here, or enquire to talk to one of our lawyers about how it could work for your organisation, and to receive a bespoke quotation.
Already have an account?
Log in below to access this content.
Enter your email to reset your password or try to login again.